Entre as muitas declarações polêmicas atribuídas a Jair Bolsonaro, existe uma em que ele é acusado de defender um menor salário para as mulheres porque elas podem engravidar, neste vídeo Bolsonaro, fala exatamente como se deu a declaração e consequente confusão.
Among the many controversial statements attributed to Jair Bolsonaro, there is one in which he is accused of defending a lower salary for women because they can get pregnant in this video Bolsonaro, speaks exactly how was the statement.
That question will be much complicated to make deputy, because you said that the woman become pregnant she must receive a lower salary, do not you think that this wrong, the woman often is a provider of his own family, as she goes earn less because she becomes pregnant?
Answer: Jair Bolsonaro
The magazine that made this matter did not interview me, took an audio Zero Hora, this field you clearly see that the entrepreneur's time to choose between a man or a woman, yet she is young or not, it will usually opt for man .
In Brazil, the big problem is the tax burden, labor charges, then usually the entrepreneur "in this matter Zero Hour", prefer the man, nothing else.
Because of this misinformation, last week, I picked up for an hour in CDN radio and did not have the dignity of me to open a space in the air, then it does not proceed, the very stuff of the Zero Hora newspaper audio, this writing that the businessman prefers man to woman.
Flavia: The businessman ok! And in the case of Srº what would be your opinion?
Bolsonaro: No problem at all, is racing, I did not pay more for a man, only because he is man and less for you (Flavia), and you more competent.
You (women) are on a level playing field for a long time with us and I think that (woman) who embarks on this wave, it just this wanting to victimize.
You pay a contest for the armed forces, we both sergeants, will gain the same thing, we both for legislative Police Congress, won the same thing, in the private sector who do the work are the boss, if we want via legislation to impose a equal pay for certain functions, you are leaving 'in my opinion' to socialism, there is freedom, you really win according to what it produces, the entrepreneur wants to productivity, if it does not think this way, it breaks.
Today the salary is much to who pays and who gets little, if you will be employed in the US, get a job now, if out of here 2 or 10 years, all right, without any problem, here you think 200 times before hiring a person.
No use to mean, as an example: I was the only MP who voted against all the labor rights of domestic workers, evil? No! I do not understand that evil is the hardest job you have is domestic, but from the moment you give all labor charges, and the amendment of the constitution has not yet been regulated, you're taking unemployment a huge mass of people, in particular women.
Link vídeo: http://youtu.be/8Ror3MKK8Tk